Is There Glass in the Sky? (A hypothetical question)

If there was a layer of glass in the sky, then:

The mysterious origin of Tektites that has plagued the scientific establishment for centuries, can be easily solved.

The reason of fusion crust (burnt glass) forming on most meteorites, and not being able to be replicated on terrestrial rocks heated to the same temperature as the extra-terrestrial rocks when entering the atmosphere, can be understood.

The idea of a rainbow forming from a glass bulb in a flashlight, shining onto a piece of paper without the presence of tiny water droplets can be directly compared to clouds acting as a surface of projection from the DIRECTIONAL light of the sun, just like the piece of paper, and not the source of rainbow formulation.

Short wave radio signals which bounce off the ionosphere to extend to the other side of earth, can be fully understood, since scientist compare the ionosphere to a “sheet of glass”.

The Auroras Borealis, which is compared to electrons generated and projected onto phosphorus-coated glass within a closed vacuum system, can be fully understood.

The greenhouse effect, i.e., global warming can be fully understood.

Ozone generation, which produces a fresh smell after a thunderstorm, which have been replicated with air ionizers that use glass plates, can be fully understood.

Comatic aberration, which is the visual effect of caustics created from a spherical glass lens, is the same effect seen from the tail of a comet.

UV protection would be fully understood.

The real reason clouds and celestial orbs like the moon change colors at different times and places in the sky is because the sunlight is passing through a different region of the electro-magnetic spectrum and projects it’s colored filtered and glass-filtered light onto them could finally make sense.

The sun and moon scale illusion could be understood through the concepts of refraction through glass lenses.

Cosmic ray protection would be fully understood.

Space Shuttle coating of dichroic glass-coated tiles, “frit”, would be fully understood.

Meteors showers

Did you know that meteors showers leave ionized trails? These trails can be picked up by radio frequencies. (Because the “ionosphere” reflects the radio signal.)

What if these tiny meteors were just skidding across the glass in the sky? And they left a hot-scored trail, a scratch, in the glass….hmmm

It seems that there is a set physical threshold, just like a windshield. They all leave trails at the same altitude. Come to think of it, the same altitude of the Auroras. (100 km, 62 miles) Hey! That’s the same altitude of the “Kármán Line”, the international boundary between earth and “outer” space”. Gee. Whodathunk!

This is overt evidence.

Evidence like this in a court of law would be enough to convict a person for life.

Welcome to the real world ladies and gentlemen.

The earth is not a planet, its a womb.

K11 A1 R18 M13 A1 N13 = 58,   G7 L12 A1 S19 S19 = 58. Kármán and Glass both equal 58. Coincidence?



Elihu, from the book of Job, believed there was glass in the sky.

"Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, as a molten looking glass?" Job 37:18

Did he have to see a meteorite with fusion crust, or a tektite to believe there was glass in the sky?

He probably just saw a rainbow, and concluded, "Ah, there's glass in the sky."

He probably didn't know about short-wave radio signals, or how auroras act the same way as electrons hitting glass tubes. Or maybe I just told him so, lol.

He had the advantage of not watching the Zionist/Jesuit-controlled media and the Zionist/Jesuit-controlled space programs. Lucky him.

Those who promote the idea that the world is spinning in a Copernican universe are the ones who diametrically oppose the physical existence of my literal heaven in the heart of my inverted earth. (The Earth does not spin.)

They promote the fantasies of space travel and the possibilities of visiting other planets and galaxies. This is partly why they created the moon hoax, to foster the idea of man to travel to distant worlds. But ultimately, it was I who created the deception, to trap the pride of man.

Sorry, but you have been duped.

Ever since kindergarten you have been deprogrammed.

The Space Shuttle needs dichroic glass coated tiles to enter and exit the atmosphere. This is called "frit". Dichroic glass is glass that has a higher melting point than regular glass. Combined with the foam underneath this glass top coating, it keeps the high temperature to the outer layer and the low heat foam prevents the heat from extending to the space craft. The friction exchange between the frit and the glass in the sky creates enough heat to melt and liquefy the glass. Then the shuttle is allow to penetrate. This is why ALL spacecraft leaving the atmosphere need a heat shield. Heat shields are on long-range nuclear warheads, rockets that carry satellites, moon orbiters, anything that goes past the glass.

The Virgin Galactic "spaceship" does not have a heat shield. This is because it never leaves the atmosphere. It only goes about 60 miles high. It has been exposed as a fraud because I've shown how it uses wide angle lenses to "prove" the curvature of the earth.

Glass in the sky is the simplest answer to all the mysteries that science cannot figure out like - the origin of tektites, and fusion crust formation, and the reason for a comet's curved separated tail, and radio wave refraction, and auroras.

Why would it be so hard for you to accept,… There is ACTUAL evidence. There is proof beyond doubt.

I think it may be because your hearts are bad.

In Jeremiah 5:21-22, I use a little riddle to hide the glass in the sky from those whose hearts are rebellious.


"Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not:

Fear ye not me? saith the LORD: will ye not tremble at my presence, which have placed the sand [for] the bound of the sea by a perpetual decree, that it cannot pass it: and though the waves thereof toss themselves, yet can they not prevail; though they roar, yet can they not pass over it?


How can the sand from the coasts prevent waves from passing? Tsunamis and hurricanes pass over the sand very easily...

No, think harder, there is a sand up in the sky. It's a molten sand. It prevents the water from flooding the continents. It was placed there after the Flood..…


"I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth." Genesis 9:13


I promised Noah that the earth would not flood again by putting a glass ceiling in the sky to compress the air and push down the water.

The "token" in this verse is a scientific token....the rainbow, a natural result of glass dividing the sunlight.


"Thou hast set a bound that they may not pass over; that they turn not again to cover the earth." Psalm 104:9

"For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known." 1 Cor. 13:12


It's not because there is no evidence for glass up in the sky, it's more because you have been told what to believe, and because have a nature that is contrary to myself, you oppose me. You have pseudo-egos that need to DIE. You would rather believe a lie. This is how your hearts fool you. Don't be upset with me. Just try to be objective.

I now erase all of your programmed understanding of the universe.

I got to the core of your heart, I searched out your foolish pride. Your pride in scientific knowledge has become utterly foolishness. How do you feel? Ashamed?, Insulted? Offended? Get over it. Repent.


Fusion Crust on a Meteorite is Burnt Glass

The crust (which is merely burnt glass) was formed simply by the hot meteor passing through and liquefying the glass. Similar to dipping a white ice cream cone in chocolate.

Notice there is no gradual, in-between layer of partial crust and partial rock. The conventional explanation of how fusion crust is formed says that the glass came from the rock itself (ablation). This is not true.

Tektite: A molten piece of sky.

The glass causes optical effects like sundogs, halos, glories, circumzenith arcs, etcetera.

It even squishes the moon if you look through the glass from a very acute angle.

Iridium Flare Observations

They’re just skidding across the glass sky, causing a vibrantly heated streak of light. (Same with meteor showers.)

How much of the population do you think heard of tektites? I'd say 2-3% at best.


Because they don't know where they came from, and are too embarrassed to go into detail about their origin?

Here are some arguments for their origin by scientists, who obviously don’t understand that there is glass in the sky…..


Arguments for terrestrial origin

The lack of any evidence of cosmic ray interaction with tektite glass seems to suggest only a short time in space and therefore they could not have travelled far. A lunar origin has been dismissed largely because of the impossibility of a 'focusing' mechanism to keep the 'swarm' intact over such a distance and also on chemical analysis of moon rocks being inconsistent with tektite material. The 'time in space' precludes origin from further afield.

There is a close similarity between tektite glass and terrestrial sandstones.

There seems to be a similar age for all tektites and microtektites in the Australasian strewn field and the 'layered tektites' and 'splash form types' found in Asia suggest an impact occurred in this region with the aerodynamically shaped australites actually being ejected the furthest.

Tektite glass is unlike any meteorite.

An 'explosive' impact could theoretically form a vacuum enabling rays of jetted material to travel back out of the atmosphere along the path of the meteor. The 'rays' would account for the dense lines of tektites .


Arguments against terrestrial origin

The mechanism for ejection out of the atmosphere for a terrestrial impact has not been discovered. The only way tektites could have originated at an impact site and been 'jetted' out of the atmosphere is if there was somehow a 'vacuum' created at the time of impact which allowed escape of the tektite material. It would be impossible for tektites to have left the atmosphere otherwise. An object the size of a large tektite would be slowed down to a halt after only a few kms flight at atmospheric pressure no matter how great its initial velocity. The preponderance of spheres as primary bodies for australites suggests a formation (possibly a condensing out) of molten blobs in a vacuum which was not affected by other forces beside surface tension. Trapped bubbles inside australites formed under low pressures.

The problem with 'jetting' according to O'Keefe is that it would be difficult to see how a tektite could be first viscous enough to resist the stresses of acceleration and then be fluid enough to yield to surface tension before it cools.

The very shallow entry angle and speed required for the ablation seen on buttons would be difficult if not impossible for a terrestrial origin.

For the 'explosive' impact required there should be a vaporization of both meteor and surface crust with a consequent mixing of materials. Nickel - iron spherules have only been found in Phillipinites and Dalat tektites and are abundant in true impact glasses but are absent from australites.

For the whole of the Australasian field to have been created by one impact event it must have been a catastrophic event with global effects. At an estimated age of 700,000 years, it happened in very recent geological time yet no impact crater has been found. For an impact big enough to throw enough debris out into the atmosphere to account for the australasian field it would need to be larger than Ireland (Lins).

Microtektites have been found in oceanic cores associated with 3 tektite fields. Their ages correspond to the macrotektites but the bottle-green microtektite composition is pyroxenitic. Pyroxenes are not common rocks and for all three different microtektite fields to contain them by chance is highly improbable.

Although Muong Nong tektites are thought to have originated from the melting of surface soils the soil in these regions today is very different being mostly Fe2O3 and Al2O3 and is lateritic. Laterites form by leaching over a very long period of time. Also, Muong Nongs are regarded as having formed in situ yet localities are up to 900km apart and up to 2400km if the Phillipine site is included - too wide a field to be produced by even a comet!

O'Keefe concluded that the instantaneous production of masses of homogeneous and relatively bubble-free glass of low water content from common soil and rocks, was not physically possible and that tektites differed significantly from true impact glasses.

To quote O'Keefe:

' We are thus forced to accept the conclusion which at first seems incredible, that tektites, despite their remarkable resemblance to terrestrial rocks, do not originate on the earth.'

We are still a long way from a complete answer.


Characteristics of Tektites

Tektites are still poorly understood. They are irregularly- and at times intricately-shaped nodules and blobs of a glassy substance. They have no crystal structure, and are therefore similar to obsidian, but are not associated with volcanic processes. Their chemistry is unique and somewhat unexplained.

The leading theory concerning their origin is the "Meteorite Impact Theory". It is postulated that many odd events occur during a meteor's impact because of the tremendous heat and pressure produced. Tektites may be fused glass that formed during an impact of a meteor with layers of rock on the Earth's surface. Tektites occur in broad bands in specific localities in different parts of the world. These bands produce characteristically similar tektites and are sometimes loosely associated with meteorite craters or suspected craters. Could these fields represent splash material from an impact? Many believe so and this idea is gaining acceptance from many scientists. The odd and diverse chemistry of the tektites could be a result of unique meteorites hitting unique rock types with the combinations producing particular effects.

Some tektites, called Moldavites, are especially prized for their clarity and unique green color. Moldavites are found in a "splash field" centered around Moldavia in former Czechoslovakia and are believed to have come from a meteorite crater in Germany. Moldavites are sometimes cut as gemstones or put into jewelry as natural uncut pieces to show off their often eerie and beautifully intricate shapes.

Physical Characteristics:

Color is black, green or colorless.

Luster is vitreous to dull.

Transparency: Gemmy tektites are transparent to translucent, but most are nearly opaque.

Crystal System does not apply because tektites are amorphous.

Habits are usually small nodules or splinters that vary from simple rounded shapes to very intricate natural carvings. Many have smooth, scarred, or pitted surfaces.

cleavage is absent.

Fracture is conchoidal.

Hardness is 5 - 6.

Specific Gravity is approximately 2.5 (somewhat light).

Streak is white.

Other Characteristics: Can sometimes be directly associated with meteorite impact craters.

Notable Occurrences include Moldavia region of Eastern Europe; Thailand and southeast Asia; Australia and Georgia, USA.

Best Field Indicators are color, odd shapes, localities and lack of cleavage or crystal faces.


Is Libyan Desert glass a tektite? Although it usually is discussed in the same context as tektites and is considered by some investigators to be a variety of tektite, there exist some very distinct differences. Libyan Desert glass has a uniformly higher silica content than tektites, and it shows no evidence of aerodynamic sculpturing. Many of the fragments are tabular and layered, which is characteristic of only one kind of tektite, the so-called Muong-Nong tektites of southeast Asia. Libyan Desert glass never occurs in such distinctive shapes as dumbbells, rods, spheres, disks, and teardrops as do tektites, and the color of the glass is rarely as dark as the color of typical tektites. In fact, some of the glass is quite colorless. It ranges in size from tiny flakes 0.01mm in diameter up to pieces the size of a person's head and weighing over 16 pounds. Both tektites and Libyan Desert glass are harder than the steel in a knife blade, but no harder than the mineral quartz. Fragments of Libyan Desert glass are somewhat lighter weight than tektites of equal size. Both tektites and Libyan Desert glass may contain bubbles; those in the glass tend either to be elliptical, indicating deformation of the bubble during flow, or elongated and pointed, suggesting deformation of original pore space in material that barely melted.


Virgil Barnes has suggested that perhaps the glass was produced by the heat wave of a passing comet or by the intense heat generated by an exploding comet - neither of which would necessarily disrupt the surface rocks. Afterwards, the molten silica glass may have flowed into low areas, puddled and cooled - thus forming Libyan Desert glass. Later, it may have been broken up by weathering and then moved, either by running water, in an earlier, wetter climatic period, or by humans in prehistoric times.

(Libyan Desert Glass is NOT formed by nuclear explosions.)

On the other hand, most Libyan Desert glass is much more dense and homogeneous than the well described porous and impure "impact" glass (impactite) found in such craters as Henbury in central Australia, Wabar in the Rub'al-Khali of Saudi Arabia, or 4 the nuclear test craters in Nevada.

The absence of an extremely large impact crater in the vicinity of the Libya Desert glass, moreover, is not highly relevant. The glass has been reliably dated (by fission-track methods), as 28.5 million years old. That’s so long ago that any impact crater may have been covered by shifting sands or erased by erosion. Opponents of the cometary or meteoritic origin of Libyan Desert glass say it is highly improbable that such large, homogeneous pieces of glass could be formed and freed of volatiles within the earth's atmosphere by any process of simple fusion of sand, while supporters contend that the chemical composition of Libyan Desert glass so closely resembles the Nubian Sandstone - upon which it rests -that the probability of finding two so similar yet unrelated materials together is extremely remote.

Obviously, the origin of Libyan Desert glass is unresolved and remains a topic of intense discussion among tektite specialists. But most scientists do agree that ancient man used the glass at a time when the Sahara's climate was quite different.


They’ll tell you that the glassy coating of meteorites called fusion crust is formed by a process where ablation occurs, and the glass from inside the rock magically escapes and surrounds the circumference of it. How so? Especially when the glass from the crust is of a different chemical makeup than the glass from the rock?

Lucy, you have some ‘splainin to do!…..


Abstract–Two assumptions commonly employed in meteorite interpretation are that fusion crust

compositions represent the bulk-rock chemistry of the interior meteorite and that the vesicles within

the fusion crust result from the release of implanted solar wind volatiles. Electron microprobe

analyses of thin sections from lunar meteorite Miller Range (MIL) 05035 and eucrite Bates Nunataks

(BTN) 00300 were performed to determine if the chemical compositions of the fusion crust varied

and/or represented the published bulk rock composition.

It was determined that fusion crust compositions are significantly influenced by the incorporation

of fragments from the substrate, and by the composition and grain size of those minerals. Because of

compositional heterogeneities throughout the meteorite, one cannot assume that fusion crust

composition represents the bulk rock composition. If the compositional variability within the fusion crust

and mineralogical differences among thin sections goes unnoticed, then the perceived composition

and petrogenetic models of formation will be incorrect.

The formation of vesicles within these fusion crusts were also compared to current theories

attributing vesicles to a solar wind origin. Previous work from the STONE-5 experiment, where

terrestrial rocks were exposed on the exterior of a spacecraft heatshield, produced a vesicular fusion

crust without prolonged exposure to solar wind suggesting that the high temperatures experienced by

a meteorite during passage through the Earth’s atmosphere are sufficient to cause boiling of the melt.

Therefore, the assumption that all vesicles found within a fusion crust are due to the release of

implanted volatiles of solar wind may not be justified.



One of many fallacies about the conventional explanation of the universe is applying the Doppler Effect concept to observing stars that have an apparent "red shift" to them when seen through a spectrometer. It is a known phenomena that this apparent red shift to these stars is only visible from beneath earth's atmosphere. In the Doppler Effect scenario an object that has a visible red colorization to it implies that the object is moving away from the observer because the red end of the spectrum generates wavelengths that are much longer and lower in frequency than the violets at the other end of the spectrum.

However, this is easily explained without any "universe is expanding at the speed of light" ridiculous theories.

There is glass in the sky. It colors the celestial objects with diffracted light. Stars are all clustered together encased in the celestial sphere in the middle of the earth, they are roughly 2,000 miles away. This region is flooded with red dispersed light when seen through the glass sky. The red light is a result of chromatic aberration, picking up the red end of the spectrum, when seen through the glass sky. Hence the stars are not moving away from the earth, they are merely "gelled" with red light.

End of argument.

Enter, the glass sky.

All stellar spectroscopy is considered erroneous and useless when concluding a stars distance or "direction" because it is mainly the glass canopy that determines the color "shift" of the stars.

Smoke it!

The “Red Shift” of Stars and the Doppler Effect

Meteor Showers?

You guessed it, the tiny meteors are simply circulating within inner space and regularly descend down to the glass and ricochet off creating sparks then ascend back up.

(Page 3 of 7)

Aberration of Light (Stellar Aberration) - DEBUNKED!

in relation to all other tektite groups, Libyan Desert Glass exhibits a noteworthy number of unique attributes.


Lowest refractive index: 1.4616

Lowest specific gravity: 2.21

Highest silica content: 98%

Highest lechatelierite particles: fused quartz

Highest water content: 0.064%


Highest viscosity: almost 6X greater than Australites at the same temperature Other unique attributes: Color, Bubble types: 100% of included bubbles are lenticular or irregular.

..There is no evidence whatsoever, of atmospheric aerodynamic shaping and it is therefore presumed that Libyan Desert Glass formed as a melt sheet of some sort,....

Interestingly, the inclusion of the high number of lechatelierite (fused quartz) particles in Libyan Desert Glass also points to an extremely high, up to 1700 C, formation temperature....(SC -Ionosphere formation)

But, the central issue in determining the impact origin of tektites remains, that is, how to transform a mass of crushed rock into a homogeneous and relatively bubble free liquid which rapidly cools to a glass.

Even the commercial production of glass takes many hours to relieve the melt of its volatile components. No partially melted material, or target rock inclusions, have ever been found in Libyan Desert Glass.

Furthermore, other known impact glasses (impactites) such as Darwin Glass are bubbly, frothy, scoriaceous and contain partially melted materials. So the controversy continues.



(SC- Simple answer is the best answer. There is a glass ceiling to the sky, it’s yellow-green. Pieces of it came down after a meteor impact to it. The meteor landed many miles away because it had more velocity than the glass it shattered. Easy.

End of mystery!

"Hubble concluded that his observed log N(m) distribution showed a large departure

from Euclidean geometry, provided that the effect of redshifts on the apparent magnitudes

was calculated as if the redshifts were due to a real expansion. A different correction is

required if no motion exists, the redshifts then being due to an unknown cause. Hubble

believed that his count data gave a more reasonable result concerning spatial curvature IF

the redshift correction was made assuming NO RECESSION [i.e., no expansion]. To the very end of his

writings he maintained this position, favoring (or at the very least keeping open) the model where no true expansion exists, and therefore that the redshift "represents a hitherto unrecognized principle of nature"


An Unrecognized principle of nature you say, eh?

(Church Lady Imitation..

”How ‘bout.....................GLASS!!!??!!

Hubble Admits it, No Expansion of the Stars!

You may have heard the news stories scattered across the world concerning massive chunks of ice mysteriously falling from clear blue skies. Well over the past fifteen years or so, many meteorological “experts” have been entirely perplexed as to discovering their origins. The ice chunks have crashed through people’s roofs, destroyed cars and nobody can understand where they are coming from. They are not airplane discharge because for one thing, airplane lavatory discharge is dyed blue and for another, some of the places where these ice chunks fall are nowhere near airplane flight paths. “Dr.” David Travis, a meteorological scientist from the University of Wisconsin at Whitewater calls them “megacryometeors” and him and his partner “Dr.” Jesus Martinez-Frias have been unsuccessful in finding out where and why they are falling. I phoned David Travis about six years ago. I told him exactly where they were coming from. I said there was a sheet of ice attached to the glass sky about 70 miles high. I gave him many reasons why there was glass in the sky. He poo-pooed my answer. Maybe he needs to be like Tennessee Tuxedo in the above illustration to finally believe.

However, when the sun and moon stop, the entire mantle of ice will come crashing down all over the world, and the “treasures” (i.e. something that is hidden) of the hail will be revealed. Job 38:22-23 And two will be in the field, one taken the other left. Matthew 24:40.

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

Page 1

Front Page

Olber’s Paradox - Bullshit

Expanding Universe - Bullshit

Big Bang - Bullshit

Earth’s Center of “Gravity” - UP or Down

The Tamarack Mine Shaft Plumb Bob “Mystery”

Page 7

Watch all my Concave Earth/Glass Sky Videos on my Youtube Playlist!

Article Here:


Next, sprites........

Front Page

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

Page 1

Page 7

The "Way of Light" in the Cell Earth/Glass Sky

Stars are Tiny Bubbles in the Concave Earth

SHOCKING! Bipolar "Planetary" Nebulae in the Concave Earth

Orbit of the Planets

Orbit of the Planets

Why Stars REALLY Twinkle

(Cell Earth/Glass Skies)  



Coriolis Effect Explained BETTER with the Cell Stationary Earth...